← Search

Leslie Mandeville

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Katy, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
272 matches · 207W–65L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history272 matches
W
2026-10-16 · Mason Creek - Double Shots · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Fitzgerald
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-10-09 · Mason Creek - Double Shots · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Griffith
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-06 · Mason Creek - Double Shots · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Gibson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-25 · Mason Creek - Double Shots · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Hughes
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-18 · Mason Creek - Double Shots · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Griffith
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Huebner championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Huebner championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Huebner championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Huebner championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-22 · Katy Park - Game, Set, Pour · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Fitzgerald
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-12 · Katy Park - Unbreakabelles · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Fitzgerald
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-08 · Katy Park - Game, Set, Pour · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shirley Hartmann
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.8% of games
3.5
96.2%
25W–1L · 72.1% of games
4.0
77.8%
147W–42L · 61.5% of games
4.5
43.5%
10W–13L · 49.8% of games
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.1% of games
8.0mixed
80%
16W–4L · 63.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
112 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
68 matches
#1 Singles
17%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
33 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams