← Search

Theresa Reynolds

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Longview, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 34W–33L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history67 matches
W
2026-09-26 · Sharp/Bennett -Longview · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Gilmore
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-09-12 · Sharp/Bennett -Longview · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with MaryBeth Reeves
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-22 · Sharp/Bennett -Longview · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with MaryBeth Reeves
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-04-28 · Hinshaw-Longview High School · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kandy Wharton
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-07 · Hinshaw-Longview High School · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Traci Jones
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-03-02 · Hinshaw-Longview High School · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amelia Maxwell
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-02-08 · Hinshaw-Longview High School · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Hickey
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-02-18 · Slice Girls -Longview High School · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lori Corpier
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
W
2023-10-08 · Hinshaw -LV · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ray Hyden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2023-10-08 · Hinshaw -LV · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ron Hepler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2023-10-07 · Hinshaw -LV · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Reynolds mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2023-06-10 · Ritch - Longview · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Patheal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
60%
12W–8L · 57.5% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
64%
16W–9L · 54.6% of games
6.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 36.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe