← Search

Dana Sandberg

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Centennial, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
137 matches · 82W–55L · seasons 2017–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2026. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history137 matches
L
2026-08-25 · WC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Burt
loading the estimate
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · CPV RED · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bryan Kortum mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-20 · WC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Seidlitz
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-16 · CPV RED · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Cranston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-31 · CPV RED · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Hall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-31 · WC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Masur
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · CPV GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Hall mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-16 · WC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juli Simmermon
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-09 · WC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with CC Dick
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · WC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Burt
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · CPV GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Hall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · WC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Gagne
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
20W–0L · 81.4% of games
3.0
69.1%
38W–17L · 56.4% of games
3.5
33.3%
15W–30L · 43.7% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 45.7% of games
7.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
35 matches
#1 Singles
20%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
17 matches
Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer