← Search

John Gardner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Manakin Sabot, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
190 matches · 89W–101L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history190 matches
L
2026-08-09 · The 3.5 HERMits - Thompson · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-08 · The 3.5 HERMits - Thompson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stuart Thompson championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-08 · The 3.5 HERMits - Thompson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jose Mendoza championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-20 · Hermitage Thompson 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristin Gardner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-11 · The 3.5 HERMits - Thompson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Turner Broughton championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · The 3.5 HERMits - Thompson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stuart Thompson championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-07-10 · The 3.5 HERMits - Thompson · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-05 · Hermitage Thompson 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristin Gardner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-15 · Hermitage Thompson 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Wiertel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · Hermitage - Sadusky 4.0 Men - Weekend · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-07 · Hermitage - Sadusky 4.0 Men - Weekend · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Bolyard
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-02 · The 3.5 HERMits - Thompson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jose Mendoza
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 70.5% of games
3.5
58.3%
28W–20L · 52.8% of games
4.0
16.7%
5W–25L · 40.2% of games
6.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 58.4% of games
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 52.3% of games
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 54.3% of games
6.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 45.1% of games
7.0mixed
46.7%
14W–16L · 48.5% of games
7.5mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 49.6% of games
8.0mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 44.6% of games
8.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
47 matches
#1 Singles
11%
20 matches
#2 Singles
7%
13 matches
Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal