← Search

Stacey Cabral

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Midlothian, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
349 matches · 243W–106L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history349 matches
W
2026-09-12 · Woodlake Cabral Combo 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Harris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Nortz
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-27 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen ODonnell
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-26 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen ODonnell
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Grosse
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-23 · Woodlake Cabral Combo 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Blanka White
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dorota Kawka
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-17 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Kratzer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-15 · Woodlake Cabral Combo 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laurie Cooksey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-08-08 · Woodlake Cabral Combo 6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Harris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-05 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen ODonnell
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-03 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen ODonnell
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
2.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 64.9% of games
3.0
76.2%
32W–10L · 58.9% of games
3.5
70.1%
68W–29L · 55.7% of games
6.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 62.4% of games
6.5
60.6%
20W–13L · 54.3% of games
7.0
50%
9W–9L · 53.2% of games
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.3% of games
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 44.3% of games
6.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 66.7% of games
6.5mixed
72%
18W–7L · 62.2% of games
7.0mixed
78.7%
37W–10L · 59.6% of games
7.5mixed
55.6%
15W–12L · 50.5% of games
8.0mixed
73.9%
17W–6L · 59.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
148 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
90 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
81 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
17 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe