← Search

Andrew Mesdjian

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
LA Verne, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
151 matches · 64W–87L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history151 matches
L
2026-10-25 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Le-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Huang
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-27 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Le-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Le
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-09-12 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Le-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Stone
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-21 · SGV Mixed Underdogs-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ennie Gonzaga mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Le-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Stone
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-07 · SGV Mixed Underdogs-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nicole Winslow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Le-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Stone
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-31 · SGV Mixed Underdogs-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Trish Newlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-17 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Le-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-05-10 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Le-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-03 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Le-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Stone
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · SGV Mixed Underdogs-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Trish Newlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.1% of games
4.0
45.8%
44W–52L · 49.4% of games
3.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
30%
12W–28L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
34 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer