← Search

Carolyn Mendez

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wilmington, DE
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 22W–7L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history29 matches
W
2026-08-15 · GCC · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Danielle Sullivan championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-04 · GCC · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Jo Russell
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-30 · GCC · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathryn Fischer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-15 · GCC · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Jo Russell
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-12 · GCC · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathryn Fischer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-27 · GCC · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leigh Corrigan
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-27 · GCC · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Jo Russell
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2024-08-09 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Celia Shafer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
L
2024-08-07 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sara Leff
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sara Leff
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-6
W
2024-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cindy Love
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2024-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathryn Fischer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 38.9% of games
6.0
87.5%
21W–3L · 63.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 79% of the time
#1 Doubles
79%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal