← Search

Scott Potter

— year-end
23 matches · 6W–17L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Scott Potter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
2021-07-21 · BCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jay Sonnenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2021-07-14 · BCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenny Wolf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2021-07-07 · BCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenny Wolf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W
2021-06-30 · BCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stefan Chimoskey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2021-06-23 · BCC RED · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
Chuck Stafford / Kevin Darby
2021-06-16 · BCC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2020-09-29 · BCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Romine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2020-09-22 · BCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Justin Astley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2020-09-15 · BCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexander Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Daniel Flynn / Dave Hwang
2020-09-01 · BCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Romine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2019-09-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ben Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2019-08-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jay Sonnenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
Teams3 teams · 2020–2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
26.1%
6W–17L · 40.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 52% of the time
#2 Doubles
52%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
3 matches
#1 Singles
9%
2 matches
#2 Singles
9%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer