← Search

Mandy Yasinski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pleasantville, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
160 matches · 88W–72L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history160 matches
W
2026-10-30 · SOL:Mixology:Rose/Guzzetti · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marc Roth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-10-24 · SOL:Mixology:Rose/Guzzetti · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marc Roth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-10-23 · Chestnut Ridge Swingers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roger Iapicco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-04 · Chestnut Ridge Swingers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marc Roth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-03 · Chestnut Ridge: Match Makers 8.0 Mix · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Josh Faust mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-11 · Genesis Saw Mill Health Club 4.0 Fall · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bridget Alaimo
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-05 · SOL:Mixology:Rose/Guzzetti · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pankaj Jha mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · Chestnut Ridge TBDs: 18+ 4.0 W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Graham
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-29 · Chestnut Ridge 18+ 3.5 W - Servivors · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Schwartz
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-22 · Chestnut Ridge 18+ 3.5 W - Servivors · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ali Miller
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · Chestnut Ridge 18+ 3.5 W - Servivors · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ali Miller
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · Chestnut Ridge 18+ 3.5 W - Servivors · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Schwartz
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
53.8%
14W–12L · 50% of games
3.5
58.5%
38W–27L · 51.5% of games
4.0
27.3%
6W–16L · 36.4% of games
7.0mixed
61%
25W–16L · 53.3% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 60.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
33 matches
#1 Singles
6%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe