← Search

Esther Spearman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Vallejo, CA
3.5M year-end 2025
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
92 matches · 77W–15L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history92 matches
L
2025-10-01 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55MX7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Bowers mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-09-21 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55MX7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gil Fuentes mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
W
2024-10-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gil Fuentes mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-10-12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frederick Crescencio mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-10-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gil Fuentes mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-09-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frederick Crescencio mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-09-21 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frederick Crescencio mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
W
2024-09-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gil Fuentes mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-09-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Francisco Una mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
W
2024-08-31 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gil Fuentes mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
L
2024-08-24 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frederick Crescencio mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-6
W
2024-08-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jonathan Warner mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2025
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55MX7.0A
2025 MIXED 55&Over · 55&Over MX7.0 · 55+
2025
BENICIA TA/BENICIA HS 40MX8.0A
2024 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX8.0 · 40+
2024
BENICIA TA/BENICIA HS 55MX8.0A
2024 MIXED 55&Over · 55&Over MX8.0 · 55+
2024
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 40MX7.0A
2024 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0 · 40+
2024
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55MX7.0A
2024 MIXED 55&Over · 55&Over MX7.0 · 55+
2024
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 18MX7.0A
2023 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX7.0 · 18+
2023
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 40MX7.0A
2023 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0 · 40+
2023
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 18MX7.0A
2022 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX7.0 · 18+
2022
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 40MX7.0A
2022 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0 · 40+
2022
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55AW6.0A
2022 ADULT 55&Over · Women 6.0 · 55+
2022
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55MX7.0A
2022 MIXED 55&Over · 55&Over MX7.0 · 55+
2022
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 18MX6.0A
2021 MIXED 18 & Over · 18&Over MX6.0 · 18+
2021
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 40AW3.0A
2021 ADULT 40 & Over · Women's 3.0 · 40+
2021
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55MX7.0A
2021 MIXED 55 & Over · 55&Over MX7.0 · 55+
2021
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 40AW3.0A
2020 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.0 · 40+
2020
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 40MX6.0A
2020 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX6.0 · 40+
2020
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 40MX7.0A
2020 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0 · 40+
2020
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 18MX6.0A
2019 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX6.0 · 18+
2019
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 40MX6.0A
2019 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX6.0 · 40+
2019
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 40MX7.0A
2019 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0 · 40+
2019
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 68.2% of games
6.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
93.8%
15W–1L · 78.2% of games
7.0mixed
84.5%
49W–9L · 65.6% of games
8.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 58.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King