← Search

Suzanne Merz-Reno

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oakland, CA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 55W–22L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history77 matches
L
2025-02-01 · BAY TREES PK 18MX9.0A · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Minh Luu mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-11-02 · MILLS COLLEGE CW7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Camille Servan-Schreiber
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-10-26 · MILLS COLLEGE CW7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nu Opapongpand
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-10-19 · MILLS COLLEGE CW8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tara Navarro
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2024-10-15 · MILLS COLLEGE CW7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Esther Li-Bland
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-10-12 · MILLS COLLEGE CW8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tara Navarro
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2024-09-21 · MILLS COLLEGE CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Esther Li-Bland
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-09-15 · MILLS COLLEGE CW8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tara Navarro
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-06-15 · MILLS COLLEGE 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nu Opapongpand
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
W
2024-06-01 · MILLS COLLEGE 18AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miho Bell
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2024-05-26 · MILLS COLLEGE 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chloe Page
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-05-18 · MILLS COLLEGE 18AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miho Bell
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 69% of games
4.0
66.7%
16W–8L · 58.6% of games
7.5
85%
17W–3L · 65.3% of games
8.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 55% of games
8.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 57.3% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
14 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova