← Search

Michael Fanelli

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richmond, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
91 matches · 55W–36L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history91 matches
L
2026-06-02 · Westwood FrankNMole - Mulholland · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Armstrong
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · Westwood FrankNMole - Mulholland · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shailesh Khatri
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · Westwood Peacocks - Cecil · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Pilc
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-17 · Westwood Peacocks - Cecil · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Walker Reid
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · Westwood Peacocks - Cecil · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Cecil
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
Default
2026-04-25 · Westwood Peacocks - Cecil · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Baxter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-07-26 · 4 Westwood IcyHotz - Nilson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Cosby
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-20 · 4 Westwood IcyHotz - Nilson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Cosby
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-07-19 · 4 Westwood IcyHotz - Nilson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackson Dyer
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2025-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Cecil championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-06-15 · 4 Westwood IcyHotz - Nilson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Gerecke
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-08 · Westwood Ladybugs - Cecil · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Walker Reid
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
80%
8W–2L · 63.6% of games
4.0
51.7%
31W–29L · 52.8% of games
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 55.8% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 57.7% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 59.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
25 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal