← Search

Alain Welty

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Santa Barbara, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
149 matches · 84W–65L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history149 matches
W
Default
2026-10-03 · COAC-LIONS · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Travis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-19 · SB LLW-LIONS-Melvin DeSliva · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jamye Hanrahan mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-18 · SB LLW-LIONS-Melvin DeSliva · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katherine Fabbre mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · COAC-Average Joes · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Benjamin Brecher
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
Default
2026-08-02 · SB LLW-More Cowbell-John Peltz · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bailey Caldwell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-01 · COAC-Average Joes · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Benjamin Brecher
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-25 · COAC-Average Joes · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Benjamin Brecher
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-21 · SB LLW-More Cowbell-John Peltz · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bailey Caldwell
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-27 · SB LLW-LIONS-Melvin DeSliva · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jamye Hanrahan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-09 · SB LLW-LIONS-Melvin DeSliva · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katherine Fabbre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-02 · SB LLW-LIONS-Melvin DeSliva · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katherine Fabbre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-18 · SB LLW-LIONS-Melvin DeSliva · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katherine Fabbre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 48.7% of games
4.0
76.7%
33W–10L · 63% of games
4.5
20.8%
5W–19L · 40.8% of games
8.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 67.2% of games
9.0
0%
0W–15L · 33.8% of games
8.0mixed
66%
31W–16L · 57.4% of games
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
22 matches
#1 Singles
7%
10 matches
#2 Singles
7%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer