Bettina Briceno-Abreu
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
141 matches · 98W–43L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history141 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2019–2025
3LIB-KATAKOWSKI 7.0 MIXED 40&O SEM F2
1LIB-LEVASSEUR 18&O TU 40 NW SEM F2
3LIB-SAULD 75 WOMEN SEM F3
4CHIP-LEVASSEUR 40WOMEN SING SEM F2
4LIB-BRICENO COMBO W/E 7.5 MIXED SEM
4LIB-SAULD JAN TRI-LEVEL 45 40 35 Women SEM
4LIB-SLADE AD40&O TH 40 NW SEM F1
5LIB-HAESSLER DAY JAN TRI-LEVEL 403530 WED SEM F1
1LIB-SAULD 8.5W COMBO SEM F1
1LIB-VOGLER Team Singles 4.0 Women SEM F1
2LIB-BARDEN SEM Tri-Level Showdown W 75 65 55 f1
3LIB-MARLEY 7.5W COMBO SEM F2
4LIB-BRICENO COMBO MIX 18&O 7.5 W/E SEM
4LIB-SAULD AD18&O 40NW TU SEM F3
6FAC-MACHUS AD18 40DW MO SEM
1LIB-SAULD 45NW 18&O AD WED SEM F1
1LIB-SAULD 85 W/E WOMEN SEM F1
2LIB-BRICENO 7.5 Combo Mixed sat/sun SEM
2LIB-MARLEY 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F2
3LIB-HAESSLER D3 DAY W tri-level showdown SEM
4CHIP-SPARR Winter 4.0 women singles sem f1
4LIB-SAULD 40NW 18&O AD TUES SEM F2
5LIB-VOGLER 40 W/E WOMEN SINGLES SEM F1
2LIB-3cts-outside-SAULD 40NW 18&O AD TUES SEM F1
2LIB-SAULD 75 WW COMBO SEM F2
2LIB-inside-KIM 7.0 18&O MIXED SEM F1
7CHIP-VOGLER 40 W sing sem
1LIB-ST PIERRE AD18-39 WTT 4.0&BELOW
3CHIP-SLADE 40nw 18 tues sem F4
4LIB-MOORE WSING 40W WIN F2
1LIB-MARLEY 35wsing win sem f2
2LIB-KORNFELD 6.0 mix 18&O sem f2
2LIB-SAULD 75 combo women SEM F3
2LIB-STPIERRE 18-39 adult league
3LIB-KIM 35DW 18 THUR SEM F1
3LIB-KIM 7.0 mix 18&O sem f4
3LIB-LIPHAM 35NW 18 MON SEM F6
3LIB-SLADE 65 combo women SEM F2
4LIB-MARLEY 35 wsing fallwe sem f2
4LIB-SAULD 40NW 18 TUES SEM F3
LIB-ST PIERRE WTT WHITE DIVISION 4.0,3.5,3.0 SEM
R2 CHIP-BERG WOMENS TRI-LEVEL 4.5,4.0,3.5 SEM
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
90.9%
20W–2L · 70.9% of games
4.0
61.7%
37W–23L · 58% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 39% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 74.8% of games
7.5mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 59.7% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Singles, 40% of the time
#1 Singles
40%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
17 matches
#2 Singles
11%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
16 matches
Singles
11%
15 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.