← Search

Leah Watson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Acworth, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 35W–32L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history67 matches
W
2026-06-26 · Lost Mountain TC (Tammy Sisco)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-02-09 · Lost Mountain (Mary Kang)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Kang
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-6
W
2026-01-21 · Lost Mountain (Mary Kang)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Kang
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-01-14 · Lost Mountain (Mary Kang)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eliane Zen
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-01-13 · Lost Mountain TC (Kelly West)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Yates
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-06 · Lost Mountain TC (Kelly West)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Kang
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-12-17 · Lost Mountain TC (Kelly West)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Najjar
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2025-12-09 · Lost Mountain TC (Kelly West)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Sisco
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-11-18 · Lost Mountain TC (Kelly West)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Bresko
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-11 · Lost Mountain TC (Kelly West)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
L
2025-07-15 · Lost Mountain TC (Tammy Sisco)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Bresko
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-06-17 · Lost Mountain TC (Tammy Sisco)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Sisco
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
4.0
52.2%
35W–32L · 49.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
29 matches
#4 Doubles
39%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova