← Search

Monte Chamberlin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fishers, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 14W–37L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history51 matches
L
2026-08-22 · Indy A40 3.0M IRCD Puckett · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Drew Darby championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-23 · Indy A40 3.0M IRCD Puckett · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carl VanWinkle
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-22 · Indy A55 6.0M IRCD Puckett · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Perry Kea
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-15 · Indy A55 6.0M IRCD Puckett · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tim Green
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-24 · Indy A55 6.0M IRCD Puckett · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris Auffrey
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-18 · Indy A40 3.0M IRCD Puckett · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Morgan Fears
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-17 · Indy A55 6.0M IRCD Puckett · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Perry Kea
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-21 · Indy A40 3.0M IRCD Puckett · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ronald Todd
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
Gary Gibler / Steve Kuhlman
2025-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Flavio Baldoni
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-07-02 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris Auffrey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
John Burns / Bob Beattie
2025-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Edward Golightly
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
L
2024-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ronald Todd
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
14.3%
5W–30L · 35.3% of games
6.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 54.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal