← Search

Laura Knapp

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Highland Park, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
274 matches · 152W–122L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history274 matches
W
2026-11-01 · NITA E 35W40i Glenview-Lobo-Corey · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Kenny
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-10-25 · CHI E 40W3.5 2.Tam Kanev Sun 3 $25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irene Salerno
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-10-18 · NITA E 35W40i Glenview-Lobo-Corey · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Greeley
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-10-17 · CHI E 18W3.5 12.Wilm Crisham Sat 5 $25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carisa Conley
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-17 · CHI E 40W3.5 2.Tam Kanev Sun 3 $25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Lobo-Corey
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-10-04 · CHI E 40W3.5 2.Tam Kanev Sun 3 $25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Lobo-Corey
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-02 · CHI E 55W7.0 7.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dawn Kenny
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-09-27 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katherine Moll championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-09-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Losasso championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Genty championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dawn Kenny championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dawn Kenny championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2020–2027
CHI E 18W3.5 12.Wilm Crisham Sat 5 $25
ESL 18 & Over · Women 3.5 · 18+
2027
CHI E 40W3.5 2.Tam Kanev Sun 3 $25
ESL 40 & Over · Women 3.5 · 40+
2027
CHI E 55W7.0 7.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $25
ESL 55 & Over · Women 7.0 · 55+
2027
NITA E 35W40h Wilmette- Lam
2027 NITA1 ESL Adult 40 & Over · NITA ESL 40 & Over 3.5 Women · 40+
2027
NITA E 35W40i Glenview-Lobo-Corey
2027 NITA1 ESL Adult 40 & Over · NITA ESL 40 & Over 3.5 Women · 40+
2027
NITA E 40W40d TAM-Lobo Corey
2027 NITA1 ESL Adult 40 & Over · NITA ESL 40 & Over 4.0 Women · 40+
2027
CDTA E 18&OW3.5 4Cent Crisham Sat 5 $22
CDTA ESL 18 & Over · CDTA E 18&O Women 3.5 · 18+
2026
CDTA E 55&OW7.0 7Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA ESL 55 & Over · CDTA E 55&O Women 7.0 · 55+
2026
CDTA S 18&OW3.5 14.Wilm Crisham Tue 7 $22
1Summer 18&O WN/WE · Women 3.5 · 18+
2026
CDTA S 55&OW7.0 5.Tam Corey Fri 7 $22
1Summer 55&O WN/WE · Women 7.0 · 55+
2026
CDTA S ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7 $22
1Summer Combo WN/WE · Women 7.5
2026
CDTA W 18&OW3.5 1.Wlmt Crisham Sat 5 $22
CDTA 1Winter 18 & Over W/E · CDTA 18 & Over W 3.5 Winter · 18+
2026
CDTA W 55&OW7.0 5.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA 1Winter 55 & over W/E · CDTA 55 & Over W 7.0 Winter · 55+
2026
CDTA W ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA 1Winter Combo · CDTA Combo W 7.5 Winter
2026
NITA E 35W40e Wilmette-Lam
2026 NITA1 ESL Adult 40 & Over · NITA ESL 40 & Over 3.5 Women · 40+
2026
NITA S 35W18d TAM-Lobo-Corey
2026 NITA3 Summer Adult 18 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women · 18+
2026
NITA S 35W40 Wilmette-Lam
2026 NITA3 Summer Adult 40 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women · 40+
2026
NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-Corey
2026 NITA3 Summer Adult 40 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women · 40+
2026
NITA W 35W40f Wilmette-Lam
2026 NITA2 Winter Adult 40 & Over · NITA Winter 40&Over 3.5 Women · 40+
2026
NITA W 40W40f Glenbrook-Corey/Varcheva
2026 NITA2 Winter Adult 40 & Over · NITA Winter 40&Over 4.0 Women · 40+
2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
25%
2W–6L · 41.7% of games
3.5
60.6%
103W–67L · 54.6% of games
4.0
26.1%
6W–17L · 38.8% of games
7.0
60%
12W–8L · 59.9% of games
7.5
60.7%
17W–11L · 55.1% of games
8.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 53.5% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 43.5% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
62 matches
#1 Singles
22%
59 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches
Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King