Search

Faith Beers

Reno, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
59 matches · 30W–29L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.45
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 27 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
72%
stay 3.5
28%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 93% stay · 7% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.38. Lower than today’s 3.45 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
NV · 3.5
34 of 235

Faith is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Faith has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Faith has gone from the 52nd to the 80th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 54.2% of games
4.0
57.1%
12W–9L · 47.7% of games
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 66.7% of games
8.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 37.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-07-17 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.096better than expected — took 92% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-13 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.020below expectation — took 55% of games against 62% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Karen Pan
0.005about as expected — took 47% of games against 51% expected
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Chardie Byrne / Emily Perkins
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Pan
+0.011better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Meagan Milca / Jessica Bethune
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Pan
0.023below expectation — took 48% of games against 57% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Riley Beirne / Tiffany Chau
2026-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica Jordan
+0.005better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Kelli Corbett / Nicole Swapp
2026-04-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Blakely Tsurusaki
0.023below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Pan
0.023about as expected — took 63% of games against 68% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Dina Kosiakova / Jessmin Lau
2026-03-08 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Pan
+0.053better than expected — took 86% of games against 56% expected
6-1
L
Christina Cook / Theresa Maloney
2026-02-07 · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Dina Kosiakova
0.071below expectation — took 0% of games against 41% expected
6-0
L
Tracy Chen
2026-02-06 · #1 Female Singles · 3.5
0.088below expectation — took 25% of games against 64% expected
6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.