← Search

Amy Dressler

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Seekonk, MA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 26W–31L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history57 matches
W
2026-08-26 · CC: Howes · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Scanlan
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-24 · CC: McVay · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Morrone
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-08-17 · CC: McVay · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michelle Russo
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 4-1
L
2026-08-13 · CC: Howes · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Francine McVay
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-06 · CC: McVay · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michelle Russo
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-23 · CC: McVay · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tracy Radlein
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-25 · CC: McVay · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Meg Luby
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-09-12 · CC: McVay · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tracy Radlein championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-18 · CC: Howes · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Noelle Vitt
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-4
W
2025-08-07 · CC: Howes · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-08-04 · CC: McVay · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-4, 5-3
W
2025-08-02 · CC: McVay · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
28%
7W–18L · 43.6% of games
6.0
64.3%
18W–10L · 55.2% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 30.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe