← Search

Fabrizio Cariani

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
WASHINGTON, DC
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
88 matches · 31W–57L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history88 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Chip N Charge · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-09 · Chip N Charge · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-5
L
2026-07-25 · Chip N Charge · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-29 · Chip N Charge · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Cahoon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-15 · Chip N Charge · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Gelfond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-01 · Chip N Charge · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Cahoon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-11 · Chip N Charge · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann-Lee Chen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-11-02 · Ad It Up · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janice Zima mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-26 · Ad It Up · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janice Zima mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-10-25 · Ad It Up · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janice Zima mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-10-05 · Ad It Up · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Perkins mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-06-09 · Chip N Charge · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 37.9% of games
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
38.5%
20W–32L · 45.1% of games
4.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 41% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 45.6% of games
7.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#1 Singles
9%
8 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert