← Search

Jamie Pearson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Coker, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
223 matches · 148W–75L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history223 matches
W
2026-10-29 · TTC Holley/Leach · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Jacobs
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-10-22 · Cash TTC 3.5 Fall · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Baggett
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-14 · Cash TTC 3.5 Fall · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Jacobs
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-10-13 · TTC Holley/Leach · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Burchfield
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-08 · TTC Holley/Leach · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Jacobs
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-06 · Cash TTC 3.5 Fall · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Zimmer
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-01 · TTC Holley/Leach · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Jo Akins
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-28 · Cash TTC 3.5 Fall · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Garayanala
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-09-15 · TWC Sandras 40+ 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cari Sandras
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · TWC Sandras 40+ 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Rowley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-08-25 · TU - McKnight · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melanie Higgins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bob Singleton mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams74 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
57.7%
15W–11L · 52.4% of games
3.0
78.6%
22W–6L · 64.6% of games
3.5
75.8%
50W–16L · 59.9% of games
5.5
100%
5W–0L · 62.4% of games
6.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 52% of games
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 59.8% of games
3.5mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 55.6% of games
6.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 50.8% of games
7.0mixed
56.1%
23W–18L · 55.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
43 matches
#1 Singles
5%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches
Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert