← Search

Michael Schwartz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ossining, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 64W–32L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history96 matches
L
2026-10-18 · Club Fit Briarcliff: Rush ADvantage · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacqueline Brabants mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-04 · WTC: Mixed Nuts - 7.0Mix · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen DiSalvatore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-20 · Club Fit Briarcliff 18+ 3.5M: Stringbreakers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Goodnough
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7
W
2026-07-13 · Club Fit Briarcliff 18+ 3.5M: Stringbreakers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Goodnough
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · Club Fit Briarcliff 18+ 3.5M: Stringbreakers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Goodnough
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · Club Fit Briarcliff 18+ 3.5M: Stringbreakers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Cohen
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-08 · Club Fit Briarcliff 18+ 3.5M: Stringbreakers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Limin Wang
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-01 · Club Fit Briarcliff 18+ 3.5M: Stringbreakers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Goodnough
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-18 · Club Fit Briarcliff 18+ 3.5M: Stringbreakers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Cohen
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4
L
2026-05-11 · Club Fit Briarcliff 18+ 3.5M: Stringbreakers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allan Colaco
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-04 · Club Fit Briarcliff 18+ 3.5M: Stringbreakers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Goodnough
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-01-11 · ClubFit Briarcliff: Rush ADvantage · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacqueline Brabants mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 39.1% of games
3.0
78.4%
29W–8L · 52.5% of games
3.5
58.3%
14W–10L · 47.6% of games
6.0mixed
63.3%
19W–11L · 55% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
18 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams