← Search

Ralph Neuburger

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Benicia, CA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 37W–17L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history54 matches
W
2024-04-09 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 65AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Fowles
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-4
L
2024-04-02 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 65AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bob Yee
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
W
2024-03-28 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 65AM6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stanley Boehm
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
L
2024-03-21 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 65AM6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alvan Bregman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2024-03-07 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 65AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stanley Boehm
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-02-22 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 65AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alan Roth
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
L
2024-02-08 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 65AM6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ted Arvisu
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-04-05 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 65AM6.0B · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Juan Esquivel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-03-22 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 65AM6.0B · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Juan Esquivel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
W
2023-03-08 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 65AM6.0B · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Juan Esquivel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-06-12 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Allen Sherbal
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2022-05-10 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55AM6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Keith Judkins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 58.9% of games
6.0
64%
16W–9L · 56.5% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 59.9% of games
6.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 65.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
13 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert