← Search

John Dyer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Holden, MA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 70W–55L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history125 matches
W
2026-09-25 · NETC:High Flyers:Andrianopoulos/Rogers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Obrien mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
Default
2026-07-14 · NETC:New England TC:Andrianopoulos · #2 Singles · 3.5
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-06-25 · NETC:New England TC:Andrianopoulos · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Andrianopoulos
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-12 · NETC:New England TC:Andrianopoulos · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-24 · NETC:New England TC Blue:Andrianopoulos · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Haidas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-16 · NETC:New England TC Blue:Andrianopoulos · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Monica Rogers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-06-23 · NETC:New England TC:Andrianopoulos/Dekker · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sergio Paez
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-16 · NETC:New England TC:Andrianopoulos/Dekker · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-02 · NETC:New England TC:Andrianopoulos/Dekker · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Moore
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-02 · NETC:New England TC Blue:Andrianopoulos/Rogers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Charrette mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-04 · NETC:New England TC Blue:Andrianopoulos/Hannigan · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lauren Smorgonsky mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-03-28 · NETC:New England TC Blue:Andrianopoulos/Hannigan · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lauren Smorgonsky mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
71.7%
33W–13L · 58.1% of games
4.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 41.6% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
59.2%
29W–20L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
25%
4W–12L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
20 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert