← Search

Amanda Barritt

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Celebration, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
357 matches · 223W–134L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history357 matches
L
2026-10-24 · USTA Campus-Barritt · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Mogauro
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-13 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rikki Myers
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-13 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ericah Claycomb
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-13 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Isabella Marcano
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-09-03 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rikki Myers
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-20 · Sanlando-Krejci · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Ortiz
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-08-11 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Isabella Marcano
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-02 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rikki Myers
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rachel Holt
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Genell Ferrell
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · Sanlando-Krejci · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pamela Bravo
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-21 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ericah Claycomb
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 48.9% of games
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 50% of games
3.5
88.6%
62W–8L · 67.2% of games
4.0
77.4%
72W–21L · 59.5% of games
4.5
18.6%
8W–35L · 36.7% of games
6.5
84.6%
22W–4L · 62.3% of games
7.5
75%
21W–7L · 61.2% of games
8.5
25.9%
7W–20L · 43.4% of games
8.0mixed
46.3%
19W–22L · 50.2% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
136 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
107 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
98 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
5 matches
Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert