← Search

Jorge Prado

Weston, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
281 matches · 175W–106L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jorge Prado to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history281 matches
W
2026-08-20 · Gonzalez-Ghaffar (Crandon Park) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Daniela Gonzalez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-16 · Midtown/Ibarra · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marta Pena mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · Gonzalez-Ghaffar (Crandon Park) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Daniela Gonzalez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-08 · Midtown/Ibarra · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marta Pena mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-04 · Midtown/Vesga · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mel Tejada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-20 · Midtown/Vesga · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carlos Dickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-19 · Midtown/Vesga · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Vazquez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-05 · Midtown/Vesga · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mel Tejada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-04-28 · Midtown/Vesga · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mel Tejada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-04-21 · Midtown/Vesga · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mel Tejada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-16 · Midtown/Vesga · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gustavo Pantin Plaza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-14 · Midtown/Vesga · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mel Tejada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
0.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 61.2% of games
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
65.6%
40W–21L · 55.6% of games
4.0
42.2%
19W–26L · 49.5% of games
4.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 88.2% of games
6.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 51.2% of games
7.5
66.7%
14W–7L · 57.1% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 60.2% of games
6.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
16W–8L · 57.7% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 62.6% of games
8.0mixed
55.9%
19W–15L · 53.7% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
94 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
81 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
8 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King