← Search

Angela McSpadden

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
LANETT, AL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 50W–44L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history94 matches
L
2026-10-11 · Chata/Elizabeth Willimon · #2 Doubles · with Amanda Nolen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-21 · Chata/Elizabeth Willimon · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Bowen
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-09-14 · Chata/Elizabeth Willimon · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Willimon
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · Chata/Elizabeth Willimon · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Willimon
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · Chata/Elizabeth Willimon · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheri Rukavina
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-03 · Chata/Elizabeth Willimon · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Erin Meeks
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-26 · Chata/Elizabeth Willimon · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Willimon
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-02-17 · Chata/Elizabeth Willimon · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Nolen
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-11 · Chata/Elizabeth Willimon · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Nolen
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-08 · Chata/Elizabeth Willimon · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Nolen
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-11-02 · Chata/Traviera Sewell · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Traviera Sewell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-21 · Chata/Heather Graham · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Traviera Sewell
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
7W–0L · 75.9% of games
3.0
60.9%
28W–18L · 54.9% of games
3.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 42.5% of games
5.5
50%
3W–3L · 54.5% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
25 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova