← Search

Phillip Johnson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
DANVILLE, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
189 matches · 81W–108L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history189 matches
W
2026-10-28 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Doug van Slyke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-10-27 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sergio Castillo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-10-03 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Fredrik Engelhardt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-22 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ozan Basegmez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-16 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sergio Castillo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-08 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bill Dodd
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-05 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ozan Basegmez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-03 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM3.0C · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jonathan del Arroz
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM3.0C · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dore Hainer
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-31 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM3.0C · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Keeling
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-31 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM3.0C · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Lewandowski
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-26 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM3.0C · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jonathan del Arroz
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
45.1%
37W–45L · 45.7% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 38.6% of games
6.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 52.1% of games
6.5
29%
9W–22L · 39.3% of games
7.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 49.7% of games
6.0mixed
47.1%
16W–18L · 50.7% of games
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
61 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
55 matches
#1 Singles
6%
11 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King