Search

Margaret Clancy

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
159 matches · 69W–90L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.16
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
2%
stay 3.0
98%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 33% stay · 67% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.04. Lower than today’s 3.16 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
17 of 213
WA · 3.0
57 of 960

Margaret is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Margaret has played at 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.02.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Margaret has gone from the 1st to the 34th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
2.5
51%
26W–25L · 49.6% of games
3.0
41.8%
28W–39L · 48.5% of games
3.5
50%
5W–5L · 54.2% of games
6.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 47.8% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.1% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history159 matches
W
Jane Peller / Alice Erickson
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dallas Jasper
+0.010about as expected — took 53% of games against 49% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Isabella George / Elizabeth Hester
2026-03-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dallas Jasper
+0.045better than expected — took 72% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 7-5
W
Lainie Dickson / Marci Riley
2026-03-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dallas Jasper
0.006about as expected — took 63% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Ruth Adler / Deb Stefaniak
2026-03-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dallas Jasper
0.015about as expected — took 57% of games against 62% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Eleonora Jeans / Dawn Hubbard
2026-02-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dallas Jasper
+0.037better than expected — took 67% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Jane Peller / Alice Erickson
2026-02-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dallas Jasper
0.006about as expected — took 40% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Sharon Fischer / Susan Whitby
2026-02-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dallas Jasper
0.028below expectation — took 46% of games against 57% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Patti Holtschneider / Deb Stefaniak
2026-02-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dallas Jasper
0.001about as expected — took 55% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
Stella Snethlage / Stacy Harris
2026-02-11 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dallas Jasper
+0.016better than expected — took 56% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
Jessica Hawkins / Stephanie Viola
2026-02-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dallas Jasper
0.022below expectation — took 40% of games against 51% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
Meredith Bearov / Joann Bailin
2026-02-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dallas Jasper
+0.010about as expected — took 47% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
Eleonora Jeans / Dawn Hubbard
2026-02-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dallas Jasper
+0.038better than expected — took 63% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.