← Search

Jennifer van Campen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
180 matches · 110W–70L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history180 matches
L
2026-09-24 · St.Grose40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Casey Novak
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-21 · Co.Haynes18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Connie Haynes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-16 · St.Grose40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Angela Coolidge
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-31 · Co.Haynes18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin Hemminger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-20 · St.Grose40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Angela Coolidge
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-17 · Co.Haynes18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle Gessner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-13 · St.Grose40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tina Dahir
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-30 · St.Grose40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Candice Kish
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-29 · Jo.VanCampen40M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffery Troch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-17 · Jo.VanCampen40M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alan Melichar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · Je.VanCampen18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Hepp
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-09 · Je.VanCampen18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Hepp
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
45.9%
17W–20L · 49.8% of games
3.0
84.1%
53W–10L · 63.9% of games
3.5
42.1%
8W–11L · 48.1% of games
5.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.1% of games
5.5
70%
14W–6L · 58.3% of games
6.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 45% of games
3.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
53 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert