← Search

Nicole Deiorio

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richmond, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 63W–70L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history133 matches
L
2026-10-06 · Westwood Arnett · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-09-20 · Westwood Arnett · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-15 · Westwood Arnett · #3 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-13 · Westwood Deiorio Net Results · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rachael Flynn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-19 · Westwood Tri Hards - Mancini · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Penny Lowrey
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-08 · Westwood Stanley · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Lloyd
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-5
W
2026-08-08 · Westwood Deiorio Net Results · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rachael Flynn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · Westwood Deiorio Net Results · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rachael Flynn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-28 · Westwood Tri Hards - Mancini · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Penny Lowrey
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-27 · Westwood Stanley · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney White
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-20 · Westwood Stanley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney White
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-06 · Westwood Lowrey · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Nord
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
74.1%
20W–7L · 61.9% of games
3.0
32.6%
15W–31L · 43.2% of games
3.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 35.3% of games
5.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 48.9% of games
6.0
50%
3W–3L · 49.5% of games
2.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 59.6% of games
6.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
29 matches
#3 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer