← Search

Michael Springer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bee Cave, TX
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 21W–21L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history42 matches
L
2026-02-08 · Lakemen · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Henry Wu
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-01-18 · Lakemen · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Phillip Peterson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-04-06 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Springer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-03-30 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Springer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
Kelly Knowles / Patrick Kovalik
2024-03-24 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Springer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2024-02-25 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Springer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-02-18 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Springer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
L
2023-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pavan Karnati
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2023-02-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Springer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
W
2023-02-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Springer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2023-02-05 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Springer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2023-01-22 · The Orphans · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fowler Hatley
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
48.1%
13W–14L · 49.8% of games
8.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova