← Search

Gail Browning

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Towanda, KS
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
234 matches · 154W–80L · seasons 2018–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2023. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history234 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Bri/Jordan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jordan Hull
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-25 · Bri/Jordan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susan Wilson
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-08-30 · KS/Zrubek/40&Over4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Valerie Glotzbach championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-29 · KS/Zrubek/40&Over4.5W · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christy Hancock championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-28 · KS/Zrubek/40&Over4.5W · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Diane Werner championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-19 · KS/Zrubek/55&Over8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diane Ball championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-19 · KS/Zrubek/55&Over8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diane Ball championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-18 · KS/Zrubek/55&Over8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diane Ball championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-17 · KS/Zrubek/55&Over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Dinkel championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-14 · McManus · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Campbell championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-13 · McManus · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Campbell championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-12 · McManus · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diane Ball championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 60.7% of games
4.0
80%
72W–18L · 60.3% of games
4.5
51.4%
19W–18L · 49.8% of games
7.5
75%
6W–2L · 58.4% of games
8.0
51.3%
20W–19L · 52.2% of games
8.5
64%
16W–9L · 55.4% of games
9.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 47.2% of games
8.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 74.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
131 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
43 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer