← Search

Kathy Dannecker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Luis Obispo, CA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 8W–18L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history26 matches
L
2024-07-27 · CC Sinsheimer Dannecker 55+ 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Morri Nash
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-07-13 · CC Sinsheimer Dannecker 55+ 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Ogren
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-07-06 · CC Sinsheimer Dannecker 55+ 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Beatty
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
W
2024-07-02 · CC Sinsheimer Dannecker 55+ 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Meertens
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-5
W
2024-05-04 · CC Sinsheimer Dannecker 55+ 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Ogren
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2023-07-22 · CC LLW Sinsheimer Dannecker · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Morri Nash
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2023-06-22 · CC LLW Sinsheimer Dannecker · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Morri Nash
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2023-06-17 · CC LLW Sinsheimer Dannecker · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Morri Nash
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
L
2023-04-20 · CC LLW Sinsheimer Dannecker · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Morri Nash
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2023-04-15 · CC LLW Sinsheimer Dannecker · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with CoAnn Weil
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2022-12-18 · Monarch/SMCC 3.5 W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Harper
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2022-12-11 · Monarch/SMCC 3.5 W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorena Torres
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 37.7% of games
7.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams