← Search

Melinda Pomeroy-Black

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
LaGrange, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
211 matches · 134W–77L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history211 matches
W
2026-09-15 · Chata/Jann Ward · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharolette Rogers
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-28 · Chata/Kami Adams · #1 Doubles · with Kami Adams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-23 · Chata/Kami Adams · #1 Doubles · with Kami Adams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-06 · CHATA/Kathryn Willis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tricia Hammond championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · CHATA/Kathryn Willis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tricia Hammond championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-05 · CHATA/Kathryn Willis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Arrington championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-07 · Chata/Kathryn Willis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Willis
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-01 · Chata/Kathryn Willis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Battle
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-01 · Chata/Kathryn Willis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Battle
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-02-28 · Chata/Kathryn Willis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Willis
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-26 · Chata/Kathryn Willis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Willis
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-02-22 · Chata/Kathryn Willis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tricia Hammond
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams67 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 46.8% of games
3.0
91.7%
33W–3L · 64% of games
3.5
51.5%
35W–33L · 50.3% of games
4.0
67.9%
19W–9L · 57.3% of games
5.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.8% of games
6.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 70.2% of games
6.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 54.2% of games
7.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 50.9% of games
7.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 55.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
38 matches
#1 Singles
10%
22 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams