← Search

Jill Wolf

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Acton, MA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 40W–50L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history90 matches
W
2026-10-23 · WESF:Wolfpack:Wolf · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phil Wolf mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-19 · WESF:Westfit:Wolf/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Aufiero championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-19 · WESF:Westfit:Wolf/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Aufiero
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-01 · WESF:Westfit:Wolf/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Aufiero
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-16 · WESF:Wesfit:Wolf · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Sammuli mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-09 · WESF:Wolfpack:Wolf · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Desrochers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
Default
2025-11-21 · WESF:Wolfpack:Wolf · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Sammuli mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-07-14 · WESF:Westfit:Wolf/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emese Varga
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-19 · WESF:Westfit:Wolf/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Iwona Borowicz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-06-09 · WESF:Westfit:Wolf/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arlene Lanciani
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-02 · WESF:Westfit:Wolf/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emese Varga
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-02-28 · MLT:West:Wolfpack:Wolf · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
42.9%
9W–12L · 48.1% of games
7.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 41.8% of games
6.0mixed
86.7%
13W–2L · 56.3% of games
7.0mixed
31.6%
12W–26L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer