← Search

Sharon Sokolsky

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Monroeville, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 21W–31L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history52 matches
W
2026-02-27 · The Quarry / N. Goldman · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Gettenberg
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-20 · The Quarry / N. Goldman · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Gettenberg
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-02-06 · The Quarry / N. Goldman · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandi Best
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-01-23 · The Quarry / N. Goldman · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Betty Axarides
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-01-16 · The Quarry / N. Goldman · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Dennie
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-02-28 · The Quarry / Goldman · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Wagner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-02-21 · The Quarry / Goldman · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gail Voss
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-02-14 · The Quarry / Goldman · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gail Voss
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-02-07 · The Quarry / Goldman · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Dennie
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-01-31 · The Quarry / Goldman · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with MaryLou Haddad
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-01-24 · The Quarry / Goldman · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Gettenberg
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-01-10 · The Quarry / Goldman · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gail Voss
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
40.9%
9W–13L · 46.1% of games
6.0
40%
12W–18L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
6 matches
#1 Singles
10%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert