← Search

James Hoben

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
NEWTON, MA
3.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
36 matches · 9W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2019. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history36 matches
L
2026-10-16 · LFNT:Natick Netmasters:Lanza/Spetter · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victoria Spetter mixed
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-02 · LFNT:Natick Netmasters:Lanza/Spetter · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristen Nuspl mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-12-21 · LFNT:Natick Netmasters:Spetter/Lanza · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victoria Spetter mixed
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-5, 1-0
L
2025-11-21 · LFNT:Natick Netmasters:Spetter/Lanza · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victoria Spetter mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-07 · LFNT:Natick Netmasters:Spetter/Lanza · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ileen Thelen mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-26 · LFNT:Natick Netmasters:Spetter/Lanza · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Robbins mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-04-05 · CCT:BraudeP:BraudeP/BraudeA · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lauriene Morin mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-01-28 · LFNT:Natick:Spetter/Bass · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victoria Spetter mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-01-26 · CCT:BraudeP:BraudeP/BraudeA · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karin Menegay mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-11-24 · LFNT:Natick:Spetter/Bass · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Emily Honig mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-10-27 · LFNT:Natick:Spetter/Bass · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victoria Spetter mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-10-13 · LFNT:Natick:Spetter/Bass · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine Terwilliger mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.2% of games
6.0mixed
20%
6W–24L · 39.1% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
42%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams