← Search

Matt Unger

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Monroe, MI
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 33W–34L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history67 matches
W
2026-06-30 · MONY-Weber 18s 4.0M F1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Hickey
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · MONY-Weber 18s 4.0M F1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with SANJEEVI PONDICHERY SUBRAMANIAN
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-02 · MONY-Weber 18s 4.0M F1 · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-12 · MONY-Weber 18s 4.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cole Glenn
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2024-07-23 · 1MONY-WEBER 18&O TU 40 MEN SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Koji Yanagisawa
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-07-16 · 1MONY-WEBER 18&O TU 40 MEN SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Phillip Somerville
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-07-09 · 1MONY-WEBER 18&O TU 40 MEN SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hill Weber
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-06-25 · 1MONY-WEBER 18&O TU 40 MEN SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Hartley
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-06-18 · 1MONY-WEBER 18&O TU 40 MEN SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hill Weber
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-06-11 · 1MONY-WEBER 18&O TU 40 MEN SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Koji Yanagisawa
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2024-05-28 · 1MONY-WEBER 18&O TU 40 MEN SEM F2 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2024-05-21 · 1MONY-WEBER 18&O TU 40 MEN SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Hartley
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 51.9% of games
4.0
31.4%
11W–24L · 40.9% of games
6.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 59.9% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 72.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#1 Singles
21%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#2 Singles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert