← Search

Julie Arguelles

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New Albany, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
190 matches · 60W–130L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2025. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history190 matches
W
2026-10-30 · Scarborough 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Fuller
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-23 · Scarborough 1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Fuller
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-09 · Scarborough 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Fuller
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-10-02 · Scarborough 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Loni Arrese
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-25 · Scarborough 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Levine
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-11 · Scarborough 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Gurwin
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-18 · Scarborough 3 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kate Carroll
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-11 · Scarborough 3 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brandi Burch
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-27 · Scarborough 3 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kate Carroll
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-24 · Scarborough 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Fuller
loading the estimate
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-10 · Scarborough 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Horvath
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-06 · Scarborough 3 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Traci Golis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 34.8% of games
3.0
31.5%
45W–98L · 41.6% of games
3.5
6.2%
1W–15L · 31.6% of games
5.5
50%
6W–6L · 54.6% of games
6.5
50%
6W–6L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
41 matches
#1 Singles
8%
15 matches
#2 Singles
7%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert