← Search

Jeeyoung Kim

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Montgomery, AL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
353 matches · 169W–184L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history353 matches
L
2026-10-18 · Juestel-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rosana Juestel
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-17 · Joo/Kim-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Munkyung Kim
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-10-11 · Juestel-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Haesook Joo
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-27 · Juestel-CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Kemp
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-26 · Joo/Kim-CC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aesook Moon
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-09-20 · Juestel-CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynne Williamson
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-09-13 · Juestel-CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rosana Juestel
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-12 · Joo/Kim-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Davis
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-23 · Juestel-CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Irwin
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-22 · Joo/Kim-CC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabrielle Davis
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-08 · CORTA/Yun Ha · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Munkyung Kim championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-03 · Lagoon MGM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Herd
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams81 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 50% of games
3.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 36.3% of games
3.5
79%
64W–17L · 62.7% of games
4.0
36.4%
68W–119L · 43.4% of games
6.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 52.5% of games
7.5
50%
14W–14L · 49.9% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
40%
2W–3L · 52.9% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 24.2% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 54.1% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 33.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
113 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
104 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
84 matches
#1 Singles
9%
32 matches
#2 Singles
4%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova