← Search

Jennifer Berk-King

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Madison Heights, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
292 matches · 173W–119L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history292 matches
W
2026-11-01 · #2 Doubles · with Julie Webb
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-10-30 · #1 Doubles · with Tricia Young
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-17 · #3 Doubles · with Carrie Ray
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-10-16 · #1 Doubles · with Tricia Young
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-03 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Livingston mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-29 · BOH-Vondell 18s 6.0X F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Livingston mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-26 · WESS-Baslock 7.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Giuseppe Turini mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-17 · WESS-Baslock 7.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jay Dalal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-10 · WESS-Baslock 7.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bart Feys mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-31 · BOH-Vondell 18s 6.0X F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Livingston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-25 · TROY-Segerlind 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fran Fairman championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · TROY-Segerlind 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Coe
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams95 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
73.6%
39W–14L · 60.1% of games
3.5
60%
78W–52L · 54.3% of games
4.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 32.1% of games
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
80%
4W–1L · 64.9% of games
6.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 47.7% of games
7.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 44.5% of games
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 56.5% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
61.9%
13W–8L · 54.7% of games
7.0mixed
38.9%
7W–11L · 52.5% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
106 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
71 matches
#3 Singles
4%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
11 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert