← Search

CAROLINA MEDINA

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Van Nuys, CA
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 91W–57L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history148 matches
W
2026-09-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeremy Corley mixed championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · V- LLW Wood Ranch Deuce Busters- Amirganian · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lee Tsai mixed
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-07 · 7.0 Deuce Busters/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeremy Corley mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · 7.0 Deuce Busters/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeremy Corley mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-17 · 7.0 Deuce Busters/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rodrigo Retamoza mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-09 · V- LLW Wood Ranch Deuce Busters- Amirganian · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Garen Amirganian mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · V- LLW Wood Ranch Deuce Busters- Amirganian · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lee Tsai mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lee Tsai mixed championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Garen Amirganian mixed championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-04-19 · 7.0 Deuce Busters/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Greg Siegel mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-19 · V- LLW Wood Ranch Deuce Busters- Amirganian · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Garen Amirganian mixed
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-14 · 7.0Deuce Busters/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Greg Siegel mixed
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
59.5%
25W–17L · 54.9% of games
4.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 60.8% of games
3.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 34.1% of games
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
68.6%
48W–22L · 57.8% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 49.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
20 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King