← Search

Shannon Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
JUPITER, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
229 matches · 152W–77L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history229 matches
L
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Barrow championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Barrow championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-30 · Armonk Tennis: Serve Squad - 18+ 4.0 W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Schwartz
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · ATC Armonk Aces 18+ 4.0 Day · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Barrow
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · Chestnut Ridge: Clay Slayers - 40+ 4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Barrow
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · Armonk Tennis: Serve Squad - 18+ 4.0 W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Barrow
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-04 · Chestnut Ridge: Clay Slayers - 40+ 4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Sullivan
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · Chestnut Ridge: Clay Slayers - 40+ 4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Barrow
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-14 · Chestnut Ridge: Clay Slayers - 40+ 4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Schwartz
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · ATC Armonk Aces 18+ 4.0 Day · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Dickson
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-12 · Armonk Tennis: Serve Squad - 18+ 4.0 W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Schwartz
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-5
L
2026-05-07 · Chestnut Ridge: Clay Slayers - 40+ 4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Kraus
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 69.1% of games
3.0
76.5%
26W–8L · 62.6% of games
3.5
65.8%
98W–51L · 56.7% of games
4.0
57.9%
22W–16L · 52.1% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
103 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
72 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
53 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal