← Search

MICHAEL ELIAS

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Round Rock, TX
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 9W–3L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history12 matches
L
2024-02-04 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Federico Gabaldon Jr
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
Jesse Gevirtz / Albert Bellard
2023-11-11 · What Doesn't Tequila · #1 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Leo Guzman
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2023-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chimene Welch mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2023-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chimene Welch mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
L
2023-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda House mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2023-03-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chimene Welch mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2023-03-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hillary Crimm mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
Micaela Wright / Jay Warren
2023-02-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hillary Crimm mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
W
2019-02-09 · Southern: Proform: United · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with DANA CRANE mixed championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
L
2019-01-05 · Southern: Proform: United · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rosandrys DeLeon mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
W
2018-11-18 · Southern: Proform: United · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rosandrys DeLeon mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
W
2018-11-10 · Southern: Proform: United · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rosandrys DeLeon mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61.1% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 68% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
4 matches
#1 Male Doubles
8%
1 match
#4 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer