← Search

JJ Fuller

Medford, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
274 matches · 186W–88L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.81
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
99%
down to 4.0
1%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 89% down · 11% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.90. Higher than today’s 3.81 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
OR · 4.5
215 of 226

JJ is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

JJ has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 7 seasons — 2 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.52019202020212022202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, JJ has gone from the 48th to the 11th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
4.0
72.3%
47W–18L · 59.2% of games
4.5
35.9%
14W–25L · 45.7% of games
0.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80.8%
21W–5L · 62.4% of games
7.5mixed
94.1%
16W–1L · 67.2% of games
8.0mixed
63%
29W–17L · 54.6% of games
8.5mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 55% of games
9.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history274 matches
L
Thomas Cunningham
2026-06-06 · #1 Singles · 4.5
−0.039below expectation — took 20% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Alfie Dewhurst
2026-05-30 · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.035better than expected — took 42% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Ronen Hamatian
2026-05-25 · #2 Singles · 4.5
−0.017below expectation — took 8% of games against 29% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-09 · #2 Singles · 4.5
+0.026about as expected — took 29% of games against 27% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Patrick Cronin
2026-05-02 · #2 Singles · 4.5
−0.069below expectation — took 20% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Nathan Rose
2026-04-25 · #2 Singles · 4.5
+0.042better than expected — took 38% of games against 27% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-04-11 · #2 Singles · 4.5
+0.004below expectation — took 20% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-28 · #2 Singles · 4.5
−0.122below expectation — took 41% of games against 71% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Jack Hammond
2026-03-14 · #2 Singles · 4.5
−0.002about as expected — took 37% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Jose Yanez / Samuel Valerichamps
2026-03-08 · #2 Doubles · with Jeremy Christensen
−0.034below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Jackson Bradley / David Fernandochamps
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · with Jason Schieck
+0.026better than expected — took 50% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
Ronen Hamatian
2026-03-05 · #1 Singles · 4.5
−0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.