← Search

JJ Fuller

Medford, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
279 matches · 186W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add JJ Fuller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history279 matches
L
2026-06-06 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Alfie Dewhurst
2026-05-30 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-25 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
Alexander van der Enden
2026-05-09 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-02 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-25 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
Sean Margulis
2026-04-11 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Eric Rasmussen
2026-03-28 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
Jack Hammond
2026-03-14 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Jose Yanez / Samuel Valeri
2026-03-08 · #2 Doubles · with Jeremy Christensen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · with Jason Schieck championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-05 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
72.2%
52W–20L · 59.1% of games
4.5
22.2%
8W–28L · 40% of games
0.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80.8%
21W–5L · 62.4% of games
7.5mixed
94.1%
16W–1L · 67.2% of games
8.0mixed
63%
29W–17L · 54.6% of games
8.5mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 55% of games
9.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
74 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
43 matches
#2 Singles
9%
25 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams