← Search

Staci Gash

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
West Point, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 13W–9L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history22 matches
W
2026-06-04 · Westpoint Called to Serve 40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carlys Lemler
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-27 · Westpoint Called to Serve 40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carlys Lemler
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-26 · WP:Called to Serve · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carlys Lemler
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-12 · WP:Called to Serve · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carlys Lemler
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-05 · WP:Called to Serve · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carlys Lemler
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-06-17 · West Point: Called to Serve · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carlys Lemler
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-06-12 · West Point: Called to Serve · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carlys Lemler
loading the estimate
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-13 · West Point: Called to Serve · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carlys Lemler
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-05-06 · West Point: Called to Serve · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carlys Lemler
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2020-02-09 · West Point Black · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike White mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2019-08-20 · West Point Called to Serve · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2019-06-21 · West Point Called to Serve · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 56.9% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 46% of the time
#1 Singles
46%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams