← Search

Val Swan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oakland, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
230 matches · 98W–132L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history230 matches
L
2026-10-24 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK CW7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Perkins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-17 · BAY TREES PK CW8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Stockford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-05 · BAY TREES PK CW8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Erika LaMarch
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-30 · BAY TREES PK CW8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Stockford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-30 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Turner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-08 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 40MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Connerley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-01 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 40MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dennis Ciriaco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · PLEASANTON 18AW4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vanessa Garcia
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-06 · PLEASANTON 18AW4.5A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marilyn Morrell-Kristal
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-30 · PLEASANTON 18AW4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vanessa Garcia
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-23 · BAY TREES PK 18AW4.0B · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Mar
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-18 · PLEASANTON 18AW4.5A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Janie McCauley
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams80 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.3% of games
4.0
40.9%
38W–55L · 46% of games
4.5
13.3%
2W–13L · 30.9% of games
7.5
51.1%
23W–22L · 50.1% of games
8.5
40%
4W–6L · 39.5% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 46.3% of games
8.0mixed
42.2%
19W–26L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
62 matches
#1 Singles
6%
14 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal