← Search

Tommy Hyres

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Midlothian, VA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 65W–40L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history105 matches
W
2026-10-29 · Epic Triple Threat Mixed Honey Badgers - Cutlip · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Kirchoff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-20 · Epic Triple Threat Mixed Honey Badgers - Cutlip · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Lowe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-18 · MTC Mixed Miracles - Crews · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amanda Mayhew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-09-01 · MTC Triple Threat Honey Badgers - Cutlip · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colin Keyser
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · MTC Triple Threat Honey Badgers - Cutlip · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caleb Geoghegan
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-12 · MTC Triple Threat Honey Badgers - Cutlip · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron Lawhorne
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · MTC Miracles - Marks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blake Winner championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-11 · MTC Miracles - Marks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caleb Geoghegan championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-07-10 · MTC Miracles - Marks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blake Winner championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-10 · MTC Miracles - Marks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Cousineau championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · MTC Miracles - Marks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blake Winner
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-26 · MTC Miracles - Marks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blake Winner
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
66.1%
39W–20L · 57.8% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 28.9% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 55.6% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 62.7% of games
7.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 53.4% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
22 matches
#2 Singles
7%
7 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer