← Search

Renee Desrosiers

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Webster, NY
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 20W–18L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history38 matches
L
Patti Mahar / Taylor Futerman
2026-06-26 · Monroe: Aquino/Fisher · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kate Dalton
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-25 · Naples Grande / Manning · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ginger Ferraez
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-02-23 · Mediterra / Ferraez · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sheryl Stephenson
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-14 · Naples Grande / Manning · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ginger Ferraez
loading the estimate
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W
2024-11-18 · Mediterra - Ferraez · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ginger Ferraez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-10-28 · Mediterra - Ferraez · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ginger Ferraez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-7
W
2024-03-11 · Mediterra - Ferraez · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ginger Ferraez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-02-14 · Mediterra - Ferraez · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sheryl Stephenson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-11-20 · Mediterra · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ginger Ferraez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-0
L
2023-08-14 · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kate Dalton
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
Lisa Kist / Carolyn Bils
2023-08-07 · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kathy Parrinello
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2023-07-27 · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Laurie Saffran
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
70%
14W–6L · 57.2% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 39.7% of games
8.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 21% of the time
#2 Doubles
21%
8 matches
#2 Female Doubles
21%
8 matches
#1 Female Doubles
16%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
6 matches
#3 Female Doubles
16%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe